Author/Authors :
Wang، نويسنده , , Hongbin and Hu، نويسنده , , Gaofei and Zhang، نويسنده , , Yongqian and Yuan، نويسنده , , Zheng and Zhao، نويسنده , , Xuan-Yong Zhu، نويسنده , , Yong and Cai، نويسنده , , De and Li، نويسنده , , Yujuan and Xiao، نويسنده , , Shengyuan and Deng، نويسنده , , Yulin، نويسنده ,
Abstract :
The post-digestion 18O labeling method decouples protein digestion and peptide labeling. This method allows labeling conditions to be optimized separately and increases labeling efficiency. A common method for protein denaturation in proteomics is the use of urea. Though some previous studies have used urea-based protein denaturation before post-digestion 18O labeling, the optimal 18O labeling conditions in this case have not been yet reported. Present study investigated the effects of urea concentration and pH on the labeling efficiency and obtained an optimized protocol. It was demonstrated that urea inhibited 18O incorporation depending on concentration. However, a urea concentration between 1 and 2 M had minimal effects on labeling. It was also demonstrated that the use of FA to quench the digestion reaction severely affected the labeling efficiency. This study revealed the reason why previous studies gave different optimal pH for labeling. They neglect the effects of different digestion conditions on the labeling conditions. Excellent labeling quality was obtained at the optimized conditions using urea 1–2 M and pH 4.5, 98.4 ± 1.9% for a standard protein mixture and 97.2 ± 6.2% for a complex biological sample. For a 1:1 mixture analysis of the 16O- and 18O-labeled peptides from the same protein sample, the average abundance ratios reached 1.05 ± 0.31, demonstrating a good quantitation quality at the optimized conditions. This work will benefit other researchers who pair urea-based protein denaturation with a post-digestion 18O labeling method.
Keywords :
Quantitative proteomics , Labeling efficiency , 18O labeling , HPLC/ESI-TOF