Title of article
Are upwind techniques in multi-phase flow models necessary?
Author/Authors
Park، نويسنده , , C.-H. and Bِttcher، نويسنده , , N. and Wang، نويسنده , , W. and Kolditz، نويسنده , , O.، نويسنده ,
Issue Information
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2011
Pages
9
From page
8304
To page
8312
Abstract
Two alternatives of primary variables are compared for two-phase flow in heterogeneous media by solving fully established benchmarks. The first combination utilizes pressure of the wetting fluid and saturation of the non-wetting fluid as primary variables, while the second employs capillary pressure of the wetting fluid and pressure of the non-wetting fluid. While the standard Galerkin finite element method (SGFEM) is known to fail in the physical reproduction of two-phase flow in heterogeneous media (unless employing a fully upwind correction), the second scheme with capillary pressure as a primary variable without applying an upwind technique produces correct physical fluid behaviour in heterogeneous media, as observed from experiments.
Keywords
Galerkin finite element methods , Upwind schemes , Two-phase flow
Journal title
Journal of Computational Physics
Serial Year
2011
Journal title
Journal of Computational Physics
Record number
1483908
Link To Document