• Title of article

    Evaluation of OECD screening tests 421 (reproduction/developmental toxicity screening test) and 422 (combined repeated dose toxicity study with the reproduction/developmental toxicity screening test)

  • Author/Authors

    Reuter، نويسنده , , Ulrike and Heinrich-Hirsch، نويسنده , , Barbara and Hellwig، نويسنده , , Jürgen and Holzum، نويسنده , , Beate and Welsch، نويسنده , , Frank، نويسنده ,

  • Issue Information
    روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2003
  • Pages
    10
  • From page
    17
  • To page
    26
  • Abstract
    The Advisory Committee on Existing Chemicals (BUA) of the Federal Republic of Germany convened a panel with expertise in reproductive and developmental toxicology to evaluate the OECD Screening Tests 421 (Reproduction/Developmental Toxicity Screening Test) and 422 (Combined Repeated Dose Toxicity Study with the Reproduction/Developmental Toxicity Screening Test) with respect to their ability to unmask any potential toxic effects on reproduction. The original assignment for that panel was to “validate” those screening tests. However, the panel members recognized beforehand that this was actually an impossible task because of lack of a sufficient database. Only five chemicals with known reproductive toxicity had been examined following the OECD Screening Test Guidelines 421 or 422. A comparison of these test results with those of the definitive OECD Test Guidelines 414, 415, 416, or additional investigations could, therefore, only have been made with this very limited number of chemicals that had also undergone evaluation by one of the test guidelines cited. In each case biological properties relevant to reproductive toxicity were also indicated by the OECD Screening Tests 421 or 422. This communication reviews the main differences in study design of OECD Screening Test Guidelines 421 and 422 compared to those definitive test guidelines of similar study design for reproduction or developmental toxicity (especially with the one-generation study, OECD Test Guideline 415). The very limited possibilities of detecting late postnatal and postlactational manifestations are emphasized, as is the low statistical power of the OECD Screening Tests 421 and 422. Furthermore, the very limited ability to unmask teratogenicity is delineated. The outcome of screening tests was evaluated based on the results of 57 studies conducted according to the OECD Test Guideline 421 or 422. The test results were categorized according to the incidence of toxic effects on reproduction in the parent animals or their offspring and related to general toxic effects. Based on the ranking of these results, recommendations regarding setting rational priorities for further evaluations of existing chemicals’ reproductive hazards are made. In general, the reviewer panel supports the OECD position that the screening tests are useful for initial hazard assessment and can contribute to the decision-making process on setting priorities for further test requirements. The panel also agrees with the OECD statement that the OECD Screening Tests 421 and 422 are neither an alternative to definitive tests (i.e., OECD Test Guidelines 414, 415, and 416) nor are they intended as their replacement.
  • Journal title
    Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology
  • Serial Year
    2003
  • Journal title
    Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology
  • Record number

    1487364