Title of article :
Skin sensitization in chemical risk assessment: Report of a WHO/IPCS international workshop focusing on dose–response assessment
Author/Authors :
van Loveren، نويسنده , , Henk and Cockshott، نويسنده , , Amanda and Gebel، نويسنده , , Tom and Gundert-Remy، نويسنده , , Ursula and de Jong، نويسنده , , Wim H. and Matheson، نويسنده , , Joanna and McGarry، نويسنده , , Helen and Musset، نويسنده , , Laurence and Selgrade، نويسنده , , MaryJane K. and Vickers، نويسنده , , Carolyn، نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2008
Abstract :
An international workshop was held in 2006 to evaluate experimental techniques for hazard identification and hazard characterization of sensitizing agents in terms of their ability to produce data, including dose–response information, to inform risk assessment. Human testing to identify skin sensitizers is discouraged for ethical reasons. Animal-free alternatives, such as quantitative structure–activity relationships and in vitro testing approaches, have not been sufficiently developed for such application. Guinea pig tests do not generally include dose–response assessment and are therefore not designed for the assessment of potency, defined as the relative ability of a chemical to induce sensitization in a previously naive individual. In contrast, the mouse local lymph node assay does include dose–response assessment and is appropriate for this purpose. Epidemiological evidence can be used only under certain circumstances for the evaluation of the sensitizing potency of chemicals, as it reflects degree of exposure as well as intrinsic potency. Nevertheless, human diagnostic patch test data and quantitative elicitation data have provided very important information in reducing allergic contact dermatitis risk and sensitization in the general population. It is therefore recommended that clinical data, particularly dose–response data derived from sensitized patients, be included in risk assessment.
Keywords :
Respiratory sensitization , Skin sensitization , Dose–response assessment , Induction potency , QSAR , Guinea pig assay , Human patch test , Elicitation potency , Local lymph node assay
Journal title :
Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology
Journal title :
Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology