Title of article
Signal detection of methylphenidate by comparing a spontaneous reporting database with a claims database
Author/Authors
Kim، نويسنده , , JaYoung and Kim، نويسنده , , Munsin and Ha، نويسنده , , Ji-Hye and Jang، نويسنده , , Junghoon and Hwang، نويسنده , , Myungsil and Lee، نويسنده , , Byung Koo and Chung، نويسنده , , Myeon Woo and Yoo، نويسنده , , Tae Moo and Kim، نويسنده , , Myung-Jung Kim، نويسنده ,
Issue Information
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2011
Pages
7
From page
154
To page
160
Abstract
Data mining is critical for signal detection in pharmacovigilance systems. In this study, we compared signals between spontaneous reporting data and health insurance claims data for a socially issued drug, methylphenidate. We implemented data-mining tools for signal detection in both databases: Reporting Odds Ratios (ROR), Proportional Reporting Ratios (PRR), Chi-squared test, and Information Component (IC), in addition to a Relative Risk (RR) tool in the claims database. The claims database generated 15, 15, 36, 1, and 1 adverse drug reactions (ADRs) by ROR, PRR, chi-square, IC, and RR, respectively. The World Health Organization (WHO) spontaneous database generated 91, 91, 137, and 96 ADRs by ROR, PRR, chi-square, and IC, respectively. We found seven potential matching associations from the claims and WHO databases, but only one of them was present in the Korean spontaneous reporting database. In Korea, spontaneous reporting is still underreported and there is a small amount of data for Koreans. Signal comparison between the claims and WHO databases can provide additional regulatory insight.
Keywords
WHO database , Health insurance claims database , National spontaneous reporting database , methylphenidate , signal detection
Journal title
Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology
Serial Year
2011
Journal title
Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology
Record number
1489424
Link To Document