• Title of article

    Occupational exposure limits in Europe and Asia – Continued divergence or global harmonization?

  • Author/Authors

    Ding، نويسنده , , Qian and Schenk، نويسنده , , Linda and Malkiewicz، نويسنده , , Katarzyna and Hansson، نويسنده , , Sven Ove، نويسنده ,

  • Issue Information
    روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2011
  • Pages
    14
  • From page
    296
  • To page
    309
  • Abstract
    Occupational exposure limits (OELs) are used as a risk management tool aiming at protecting against negative health effects of occupational exposure to harmful substances. The systems of OEL development have not been standardized and divergent outcomes have been reported. However some harmonization processes have been initiated, primarily in Europe. This study investigates the state of harmonization in a global context. The OEL systems of eight Asian and seventeen European organizations are analyzed with respect to similarities and differences in: (1) the system for determining OELs, (2) the selection of substances, and (3) the levels of the OELs. The majority of the investigated organizations declare themselves to have been influenced by the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH), and in many cases this can be empirically confirmed. The EU harmonization process is reflected in trends towards convergence within the EU. However, comparisons of Asian and European organizations provide no obvious evidence that OELs are becoming globally harmonized.
  • Keywords
    Risk management , Occupational exposure limits , Chemical regulation , The European Union , Harmonization , ACGIH , ASIA
  • Journal title
    Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology
  • Serial Year
    2011
  • Journal title
    Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology
  • Record number

    1489461