Title of article
Effect of tasting and information on consumer opinion about pig castration
Author/Authors
Kallas، نويسنده , , Zein and Gil، نويسنده , , José Maria and Panella-Riera، نويسنده , , Nuria and Blanch، نويسنده , , Marta and Font-i-Furnols، نويسنده , , Maria and Chevillon، نويسنده , , Patrick and De Roest، نويسنده , , Kees and Tacken، نويسنده , , Gemma and Oliver، نويسنده , , Maria Angels Custal Teixidor، نويسنده ,
Issue Information
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2013
Pages
8
From page
242
To page
249
Abstract
Our research explored the relative importance of pig castration amongst other aspects of animal welfare, and the potential impact of information and sensory experiences on European Union (EU) consumersʹ preferences. The EU is considering a future ban on surgical pig castration by 2018 which may affect markets and consumersʹ preferences. We carried out an empirical study using consumer-level data obtained from questionnaires completed in a controlled environment by a total of 825 consumers. The experiment was carried out in six EU countries (Spain, United Kingdom, The Netherlands, France, Italy and Germany) which account for 66.0% of the EU-27ʹs and 76.3% of the EU-15ʹs meat production. Results show that consumers do not perceive pig castration to be a relevant aspect of animal welfare nor its relationship with meat quality. Consumers with healthy life styles, concerned about animal welfare and who have had a negative sensory experience with boar meat are willing to accept paying more to avoid boar taint.
Keywords
animal welfare , Pig castration , Willingness to pay , boar taint , Sensory Experience
Journal title
Meat Science
Serial Year
2013
Journal title
Meat Science
Record number
1491123
Link To Document