Surface versus incorporated residue effects on water-stable aggregates

Reduced tillage methods for field crop production result in less disruption of soil structure and often increased amounts of crop residue maintained on the soil surface. The combination of these two factors produces increased surface soil aggregation. This study was conducted in the field and within pots to determine whether surface residue by itself improves soil aggregation within a short period of time. The soil was a silt loam loess deposit in the Pacific Northwest, USA, where summers are hot and dry, and most precipitation (420 mm) is received during the mild winters. Two pot studies were conducted over winter, one under a shelter with controlled irrigations (183 mm), and the other outdoors receiving natural precipitation (77 mm). In both pot studies 640 g m−2 wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) residue was either placed on the surface of the soil or thoroughly mixed into the soil. The field study was conducted on plots where, for the past 7 years, wheat crop residues were either incorporated through chisel/disk tillage or removed before tillage and replaced on the surface after tillage. The field study included plots where wheat was grown with no tillage. In the pots, there was no significant effect due to residue treatment on aggregate mean weight diameter, measured monthly for 4 winter months. This was true despite dissolved organic carbon being leached from the surface residue. In the 7-year-old field plots, replacing residues on the surface resulted in slightly greater mean weight diameter of aggregates at 5–10 cm depth compared to the mixed residue treatment. The no-till plots had significantly greater mean weight diameter at 0–5 cm depth than either tilled treatment. Our conclusion is that surface residue by itself failed to increase aggregation of tilled surface soil within the first rainy season after tillage.