Author/Authors :
Bond، نويسنده , , Lyndal and Clements، نويسنده , , Jackie and Bertalli، نويسنده , , Nadine and Evans-Whipp، نويسنده , , Tracy and McMorris، نويسنده , , Barbara J. and Patton، نويسنده , , George C. and Toumbourou، نويسنده , , John W. and Catalano، نويسنده , , Richard F.، نويسنده ,
Abstract :
Purpose
mine concordance between two self-reported measures of puberty: Sexual Maturation Scale (SMS) and Pubertal Development Scale (PDS) and their acceptability to adolescents.
s
ipants of a school-based study in grades 5, 7 and 9 were classified into one of 5 pubertal stages using each method.
s
tudents (age 9–16 years) participated. Agreement was moderate for males ( κ 0.42, 95% CI 0.39, 0.45) and females ( κ 0.57, 95% CI 0.53, 0.61). Concordance within one stage was excellent (females 97%, males 89%), with discrepancies due to females being classified one stage later on the PDS (26%) and males one stage earlier (32%). There were more missing data for the SMS (13%) than the PDS (4%).
sions
the level of concordance and difficulties of using the drawings in a school-based survey, we would recommend the PDS as an alternative to assess pubertal status in epidemiological studies.