Author/Authors :
Diana، نويسنده , , G. and Yamasaki، نويسنده , , Y. and Larsen، نويسنده , , A. and Rocchi، نويسنده , , D. and Giappino، نويسنده , , S. and Argentini، نويسنده , , T. and Pagani، نويسنده , , A. V. Villani، نويسنده , , M. and Somaschini، نويسنده , , C. and Portentoso، نويسنده , , M.، نويسنده ,
Abstract :
A comparison of the aeroelastic response of four 1:220 aeroelastic models representing three different construction stages and the completion stage of the Izmit Bay suspension bridge in Turkey is presented.
unnel tests were performed in the same laboratory both in smooth and turbulent flow conditions to investigate the aeroelastic stability and the buffeting response.
tion bridge results are used as a reference for considerations on how the variation of the structural characteristics and the different aerodynamics of the various construction stages influence the bridge stability and the buffeting response.
Keywords :
Aeroelastic model , Long span suspension bridge , Flutter instability , buffeting response , Completion stage , Erection stage