Erratum to “Mathematical correlations for predicting protein retention times in hydrophobic interaction chromatography”: [J. Chromatogr. A 978 (2002) 71–79]☆

Single-component adsorption-isotherm data were acquired by frontal analysis (FA) for six low-molecular-mass compounds (phenol, aniline, caffeine, theophylline, ethylbenzene and propranolol) on one Kromasil-C18 column, using water–methanol solutions (between 70:30 and 20:80, v/v) as the mobile phase. Propranolol data were also acquired using an acetate buffer (0.2 M) instead of water. The data were modeled for best agreement between calculated and experimental overloaded band profiles. The adsorption energy distribution was also derived and used for the selection of the best isotherm model. Widely different isotherm models were found to model best the data obtained for these compounds, convex upward (i.e. Langmuirian), convex downward (i.e. anti-Langmuirian), and S-shaped isotherms. Using the same sample size for all columns (loading factor, Lf≈10%), overloaded band profiles were recorded on four different columns packed with the same batch of Kromasil-C18 and five other columns packed with different batches of Kromasil-C18. These experimental band profiles were compared to the profile calculated from the isotherm measured by FA on the first column. The repeatability as well as the column-to-column and the batch-to-batch reproducibilities of the band profiles are better than 4%.