Title of article
Model based conjectures on mammalian clock controversies
Author/Authors
Forger، نويسنده , , Daniel B. and Peskin، نويسنده , , Charles S.، نويسنده ,
Issue Information
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2004
Pages
7
From page
533
To page
539
Abstract
We explore some predictions of a previously developed detailed model of molecular timekeeping in mammals (Forger and Peskin, PNAS, 100:14806) in areas where our understanding of clock mechanisms are incomplete. It is conjectured that: (1) the clockʹs 24-h period depends on mRNA stability. (2) REV-ERBα suppresses and/or entrains rhythms in peripheral tissues by regulating CRY1 transcription. (3) CLK:BMAL1 oscillations are suppressed in the suprachiasmatic nuclei to enhance oscillations in other proteins. (4) PER2 is ineffective at causing phase advances because it is not induced by light during the late night. (5) The clock is a limit cycle oscillator that shows characteristics of the Evening and Morning oscillator model.
Keywords
Circadian clock , Mathematical Models , PER , eukaryotic transcription regulation , Cry , BMAL Rev-erb? , Clock , Phase response curve
Journal title
Journal of Theoretical Biology
Serial Year
2004
Journal title
Journal of Theoretical Biology
Record number
1536633
Link To Document