Title of article :
Architectural constraints in IEC 61508: Do they have the intended effect?
Author/Authors :
Mary Ann Lundteigen، نويسنده , , Mary Ann and Rausand، نويسنده , , Marvin، نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2009
Pages :
6
From page :
520
To page :
525
Abstract :
The standards IEC 61508 and IEC 61511 employ architectural constraints to avoid that quantitative assessments alone are used to determine the hardware layout of safety instrumented systems (SIS). This article discusses the role of the architectural constraints, and particularly the safe failure fraction (SFF) as a design parameter to determine the hardware fault tolerance (HFT) and the redundancy level for SIS. The discussion is based on examples from the offshore oil and gas industry, but should be relevant for all applications of SIS. The article concludes that architectural constraints may be required to compensate for systematic failures, but the architectural constraints should not be determined based on the SFF. The SFF is considered to be an unnecessary concept.
Keywords :
Safety instrumented system , Hardware fault tolerance , Systematic failure , Safe failure fraction , Probability of failure on demand
Journal title :
Reliability Engineering and System Safety
Serial Year :
2009
Journal title :
Reliability Engineering and System Safety
Record number :
1572304
Link To Document :
بازگشت