Difference between Guinea Pig and Rat in the Liver Peroxisomal Response to Equivalent Plasmatic Level of Ciprofibrate

Guinea pig was previously classified as a species nonresponsive to peroxisome proliferators. However, none of the previous reports was based on pharmacokinetic data. Here, after a comparative pharmacokinetic study between guinea pig and rat, we evaluate the guinea pig liver peroxisomal response to ciprofibrate, a hypolipemic agent and a potent peroxisome proliferator in rat. (1) Pharmacokinetic results show that plasmatic concentrations of ciprofibrate are equivalent in guinea pig and rat when guinea pigs are treated with ciprofibrate at 30 mg/kg twice a day and rats are treated at 3 mg/kg once a day. (2) The treatment of guinea pigs at 30 mg/kg twice a day for 2 weeks leads to a significant increase in the liver peroxisomal palmitoyl-CoA oxidase activity (×1.6) and also in the microsomal ω-laurate hydroxylase activity (×1.8). These increases are in accordance with the changes in polypeptide patterns of isolated liver peroxisomes as well as in the immunoblotting of acyl-CoA oxidase. It is deduced that a weak, but significant, peroxisome proliferation can occur in guinea pig liver after a ciprofibrate treatment at dosages corresponding to equivalent plasmatic concentrations of the drug between guinea pig and rat. (3) The hybridization of guinea pig liver RNA with the rat liver-inducible acyl-CoA oxidase cDNA probe shows a decrease in the corresponding heterologuous mRNA content after treatment with ciprofibrate at 30 mg/kg twice a day. This result contrasts with the slight increase observed in immunodetection and in enzymatic assays, suggesting the existence of at least two different acyl-CoA oxidases in guinea pig liver peroxisomes.