• Title of article

    Inter-comparison of microwave satellite soil moisture retrievals over the Murrumbidgee Basin, southeast Australia

  • Author/Authors

    Su، نويسنده , , Chun-Hsu and Ryu، نويسنده , , Dongryeol and Young، نويسنده , , Rodger I. and Western، نويسنده , , Andrew W. and Wagner، نويسنده , , Wolfgang، نويسنده ,

  • Issue Information
    روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2013
  • Pages
    11
  • From page
    1
  • To page
    11
  • Abstract
    The use of satellite-based soil moisture retrievals for hydrologic, meteorological and climatological applications is advancing significantly due to increasing capability and temporal coverage of current and future missions. Characterisation of the relative skill of soil moisture products from different satellite sensors on a common spatial grid is crucial to achieve synergetic applications. This paper therefore evaluates three soil moisture products from AMSR-E (Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer — Earth Observing System), ASCAT (Advanced Scatterometer) and SMOS (Soil Moisture and Ocean Salinity) in absolute soil moisture units and on a common grid, against in-situ observations from southeast Australia. Before renormalisation, the three products yield correlations of 0.63–0.71 and a similar root-mean-square difference (RMSD) in the order of 0.1 m3 m− 3, although showing different levels of error contributions from bias, variance and correlations. The results are compared with land and precipitation data to investigate the sensitivity of their errors to land surface features. Three renormalisation strategies – minimum–maximum matching, mean/standard-deviation (μ–σ) matching and cumulative distribution function (CDF) matching – are considered for correcting systematic differences between ground and satellite data. The renormalised satellite data is found to retain RMSDs of 0.04–0.06 m3 m− 3 on average. The CDF method produces only marginal further improvements to correlations (0.67–0.75) and RMSDs compared to the μ–σ approach. The renormalisations by μ–σ and CDF methods also bring three products into better agreements with each other, but lead to strong correlations between RMSD and the dynamic range of in-situ soil moisture.
  • Keywords
    Soil moisture , Remote sensing , AMSR-E , SMOS , ASCAT , Validation
  • Journal title
    Remote Sensing of Environment
  • Serial Year
    2013
  • Journal title
    Remote Sensing of Environment
  • Record number

    1633232