Title of article :
Comparison of two express immunotechniques with polyelectrolyte carriers, ELISA and FIIAA, for the analysis of atrazine
Author/Authors :
Krنmer، نويسنده , , Petra M. and Franke، نويسنده , , Annette and Zherdev، نويسنده , , Anatoly V. and Yazynina، نويسنده , , Elena V. and Dzantiev، نويسنده , , Boris B.، نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
ماهنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2005
Abstract :
Conventional immunoassays on microtiterplates are very useful analytical tools in environmental analysis, but the long assay times, usually in the range of hours, are a drawback. To overcome this disadvantage, the development of fast (express) assay formats is described, which use polyelectrolytes as carriers. Two semi-homogeneous immunochemical methods, namely the polyelectrolyte-ELISA (enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay) and the express-FIIAA (flow injection immunoaffinity analysis) for the analysis of the herbicide atrazine were set-up. Using polyclonal antisera for atrazine, the following results were obtained. Standard curves for atrazine showed a linear range from 3 to 100 μg l−1 in polyelectrolyte-ELISA and 0.3–100 μg l−1 in express-FIIAA. The test midpoints in polyelectrolyte-ELISA and express-FIIAA were 12 and 5 μg l−1, respectively. The duration time of the immunochemical reaction was in both assays 15 min, but the total assay time differed (30 min (polyelectrolyte-ELISA) and 18 min (express-FIIAA)). A significant difference between the formats could be observed in the number of samples that can be determined per day. The polyelectrolyte-ELISA can handle samples in parallel on a microtiterplate (usually 20/plate), whereas in the express-FIIAA the samples are automatically analysed one after another. This first demonstration of these techniques shows the potential of these methods, but also their limitations.
Keywords :
Screening of water samples , ELISA , Atrazine , polyelectrolytes , FIIAA