Decarbonized hydrogen and electricity from natural gas

This paper discusses configuration, attainable performances and thermodynamic features of stand-alone plants for the co-production of de-carbonized hydrogen and electricity from natural gas (NG) based on commercially available technology. us on the two basic technologies currently used in large industrial applications: fired tubular reformer (FTR) and auto-thermal reformer (ATR). In both cases we assume that NG is pre-heated and humidified in a saturator providing water for the reforming reaction; this reduces the amount of steam to be bled from the power cycle and increases electricity production. Outputs flows are made available at conditions suitable for transport via pipeline: 60 bar for pure hydrogen, 150 bar for pure CO2. To reduce hydrogen compression power requirements reforming is carried out at relatively high pressures: 25 bar for FTR, 70 bar for ATR. Reformed gas is cooled and then passed through two water–gas shift reactors to optimize heat recovery and maximize the conversion to hydrogen. In plants with CO2 capture, shifted gas goes through an amine-based chemical absorption system that removes most of the CO2. Pure hydrogen is obtained by pressure swing absorption (PSA), leaving a purge gas utilized to fire the reformer (in FTR) and to boost electricity production. e power cycle we consider conventional steam cycles (SC) and combined cycles (CC). The scale of plants based on a CC is determined by the gas turbine. To maintain NG input within the same range (around 1200 MW), we considered a General Electric 7FA for ATR, a 6FA for FTR. The scale of plants with SC is set by assuming the same NG input of the corresponding CC plant. nd mass balances are evaluated by a model accounting for the constraints posed by commercial technology, as well as the effects of scale. Results show that, from a performance standpoint, the technologies of choice for the production of de-carbonized hydrogen from NG are FTR with SC or ATR with CC. When operated at high steam-to-carbon ratios, the latter reach CO2 emissions chargeable to hydrogen of 10–11 kg of CO2 per GJLHV—less than 20% of NG—with an equivalent efficiency of hydrogen production in excess of 77%.