Title of article
Solubility of carbon in α-iron under volumetric strain and close to the Σ5(3 1 0)[0 0 1] grain boundary: Comparison of DFT and empirical potential methods
Author/Authors
Hristova، نويسنده , , Elisaveta and Janisch، نويسنده , , Rebecca and Drautz، نويسنده , , Ralf and Hartmaier، نويسنده , , Alexander، نويسنده ,
Issue Information
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2011
Pages
9
From page
1088
To page
1096
Abstract
The solubility of carbon in α-Fe as a function of lattice strain and in the vicinity of the ∑ 5 ( 3 1 0 ) [ 0 0 1 ] symmetrical tilt grain boundary is calculated with ab initio methods based on density-functional theory (DFT). The results are compared to four different empirical potentials: the embedded-atom method (EAM) potentials of Lau et al. [1], Ruda et al. [2] and Hepburn et al. [3], and the modified embedded-atom method (MEAM) potential of Lee [4]. The results confirm that the solubility of carbon in body-centered-cubic (bcc) Fe increases under local volume expansion and provide quantitative data for the excess enthalpy to be used in thermodynamic databases. According to our study the excess enthalpy obtained from DFT is more strain-sensitive than the ones obtained from the tested empirical potentials. The comparison of the applied methods furthermore reveals that among the empirical potentials the MEAM is most appropriate to describe the solubility of C in bcc Fe under strain. The differences between the four empirical potentials stem from different parameterizations of the EAM potentials and, in the case of the MEAM, from the altogether different formalism that also includes angular dependent terms in the binding energy.
Keywords
Empirical potentials , Density-functional theory , Iron , carbon , Excess enthalpy
Journal title
Computational Materials Science
Serial Year
2011
Journal title
Computational Materials Science
Record number
1688489
Link To Document