Title of article :
Hydrodynamic modeling of downward gas–solid flow. Part II: Co-current flow
Author/Authors :
Arsenijevi?، نويسنده , , Zorana and Kalu?erovi? Radoi?i?، نويسنده , , Tatjana and Gari?-Grulovi?، نويسنده , , Radmila and ?uri?، نويسنده , , Mihal and Grbav?i?، نويسنده , , ?eljko، نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2014
Abstract :
The one-dimensional model of accelerating turbulent downward co-current gas–solid flow of coarse particles was formulated and experimentally verified by measuring the pressure distribution along the transport tube. The continuity and momentum equations were used in the model formulation and variational model was used for the prediction of the fluid–particle interphase drag coefficient.
periments were performed by transporting spherical glass particles 1.94 mm in diameter in a 16 mm i.d. acrylic tube at constant solid mass flux of 392.8 kg/m2 s. Tube Reynolds number ranged from 880 to 11,300 and the slip Reynolds number from 32 to 670. At these conditions, the loading ratio Gp/Gf was in the range from 395 to 31. Experimental data for the static fluid pressure distribution along the transport tube agree quite well with the model predictions.
sults measured at a distance of 1.51 m from the transport tube inlet show that the particle velocity and the mean voidage increase with the increase in superficial gas velocity. The slip velocity changes from negative values at low gas superficial velocities to positive values at high gas superficial velocities. The same trend was observed for the change of the pressure gradient in the system.
lues of the pressure gradient, porosity, particle velocity and slip velocity along the tube were calculated according to the formulated model. The distance from the transport tube inlet at which the slip velocity changes its sign from positive to negative is the function of the gas superficial velocity. At positive slip velocity both gravity and drag contribute to particle acceleration. At negative slip velocity the drag force acts in upward direction resisting the particle acceleration. In downward co-current gas–solid flow acceleration length is relatively long, about two times longer compared to the upward co-current gas–solid flow.
Keywords :
Co-current gas–solid flow , Downer , hydrodynamic modeling
Journal title :
Powder Technology
Journal title :
Powder Technology