Title of article :
Non–High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol, Guideline Targets, and Population Percentiles for Secondary Prevention in 1.3 Million Adults: The VLDL-2 Study (Very Large Database of Lipids)
Author/Authors :
Elshazly، نويسنده , , Mohamed B. and Martin، نويسنده , , Seth S. and Blaha، نويسنده , , Michael J. and Joshi، نويسنده , , Parag H. and Toth، نويسنده , , Peter P. and McEvoy، نويسنده , , John W. and Al-Hijji، نويسنده , , Mohammed A. and Kulkarni، نويسنده , , Krishnaji R. and Kwiterovich، نويسنده , , Peter O. and Blumenthal، نويسنده , , Roger S. and Jones، نويسنده , , Steven R.، نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2013
Pages :
6
From page :
1960
To page :
1965
Abstract :
Objectives tudy sought to examine patient-level discordance between population percentiles of non–high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C). ound L-C is an alternative to LDL-C for risk stratification and lipid-lowering therapy. The justification for the present guideline-based non–HDL-C cutpoints of 30 mg/dl higher than the LDL-C cutpoints remains largely untested. s igned population percentiles to non–HDL-C and Friedewald-estimated LDL-C values of 1,310,440 U.S. adults with triglyceride levels <400 mg/dl who underwent lipid testing by vertical spin density gradient ultracentrifugation (Atherotech, Birmingham, Alabama) from 2009 to 2011. s cutpoints of 70, 100, 130, 160, and 190 mg/dl were in the same population percentiles as non–HDL-C values of 93, 125, 157, 190, and 223 mg/dl, respectively. Non–HDL-C values reclassified a significant proportion of patients within or to a higher treatment category compared with Friedewald LDL-C values, especially at LDL-C levels in the treatment range of high-risk patients and at triglyceride levels ≥150 mg/dl. Of patients with LDL-C levels <70 mg/dl, 15% had a non–HDL-C level ≥100 mg/dl (guideline-based cutpoint) and 25% had a non–HDL-C level ≥93 mg/dl (percentile-based cutpoint); if triglyceride levels were 150 to 199 mg/dl concurrently, these values were 22% and 50%, respectively. sions is significant patient-level discordance between non–HDL-C and LDL-C percentiles at lower LDL-C and higher triglyceride levels, which has implications for the treatment of high-risk patients. Current non–HDL-C cutpoints for high-risk patients may need to be lowered to match percentiles of LDL-C cutpoints. Relatively small absolute reductions in non–HDL-C cutpoints result in substantial reclassification of patients to higher treatment categories with potential implications for risk assessment and treatment. (The Very Large Database of Lipids [VLDL-2]; NCT01698489)
Keywords :
non–HDL cholesterol , Discordance , Percentiles , lipids , LDL cholesterol , Secondary prevention
Journal title :
JACC (Journal of the American College of Cardiology)
Serial Year :
2013
Journal title :
JACC (Journal of the American College of Cardiology)
Record number :
1743637
Link To Document :
بازگشت