Title of article :
Development and measurement properties of the self assessment version of the INTERMED for the elderly to assess case complexity
Author/Authors :
Peters، نويسنده , , Lilian L. and Boter، نويسنده , , Han and Slaets، نويسنده , , Joris P.J. and Buskens، نويسنده , , Erik، نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2013
Pages :
5
From page :
518
To page :
522
Abstract :
AbstractObjectives TERMED for the Elderly Self Assessment (IM-E-SA) was developed to support health care professionals in providing demand driven elderly care. It assesses case complexity and health care needs as perceived by older adults themselves. By applying this instrument tailored care can be provided as it supports professionals in their allocation decisions. The aim was to evaluate the measurement properties of the IM-E-SA. s s cross-sectional study 338 elderly people completed a postal questionnaire and participated in an interview. Feasibility of the IM-E-SA was assessed by determining the percentages of missing values per item. Reliability of the IM-E-SA was expressed as Cronbachʹs alpha. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were calculated between the IM-E-SA and IM-E. Nonparametric tests were applied to assess if the IM-E-SA could distinguish between subgroups of elderly adults who differed on demographic characteristics and the prevalence of diseases/disorders. Convergent validity and discriminant validity were assessed using Spearman rank correlations between the IM-E-SA and IM-E, life satisfaction (Cantrilʹs Ladder of Life), activities of daily living (Katz extended), quality of life (EQ-5D), mental health (SF-36) and prevalence of diseases/disorders. s tages of missing values per IM-E-SA item ranged from 0 to 5%. Cronbachʹs alpha was .78. The ICC between the total scores of the IM-E-SA and the IM-E was .68. The IM-E-SA yielded statistically significant differences between subgroups (known-group validity). Correlations evaluating the convergent validity were moderate to strong (.50–.70). Those correlations assessing the discriminant validity were moderate (.38–.53). sion tudy supports the feasibility, reliability and validity of the IM-E-SA.
Keywords :
Case complexity , development , Elderly People , Psychometric evaluation , Measurement
Journal title :
Journal of Psychosomatic Research
Serial Year :
2013
Journal title :
Journal of Psychosomatic Research
Record number :
1744265
Link To Document :
بازگشت