Title of article :
Comparison of the Hemodynamic Performance of Percutaneous and Surgical Bioprostheses for the Treatment of Severe Aortic Stenosis
Author/Authors :
Clavel، نويسنده , , Marie-Annick and Webb، نويسنده , , John G. and Pibarot، نويسنده , , Philippe and Altwegg، نويسنده , , Lukas and Dumont، نويسنده , , Eric and Thompson، نويسنده , , Chris and De Larochellière، نويسنده , , Robert D. Doyle، نويسنده , , Daniel and Masson، نويسنده , , Jean-Bernard and Bergeron، نويسنده , , Sebastien and Bertrand، نويسنده , , Olivier F. and Rodés-Cabau، نويسنده , , Josep، نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2009
Pages :
9
From page :
1883
To page :
1891
Abstract :
Objectives tudy was undertaken to compare the hemodynamic performance of a percutaneous bioprosthesis to that of surgically implanted (stented and stentless) bioprostheses for the treatment of severe aortic stenosis. s patients who underwent percutaneous aortic valve implantation (PAVI) with the Cribier-Edwards or Edwards SAPIEN bioprosthetic valve (Edwards Lifesciences, Inc., Irvine, California) were matched 1:1 for sex, aortic annulus diameter, left ventricular ejection fraction, body surface area, and body mass index, with 2 groups of 50 patients who underwent surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) with a stented valve (Edwards Perimount Magna [SAVR-ST group]), or a stentless valve (Medtronic Freestyle, Medtronic, Minneapolis, Minnesota [SAVR-SL group]). Doppler echocardiographic data were prospectively obtained before the intervention, at discharge, and at 6- to 12-month follow-up. s ransprosthetic gradient at discharge was lower (p < 0.001) in the PAVI group (10 ± 4 mm Hg) compared with the SAVR-ST (13 ± 5 mm Hg) and SAVR-SL (14 ± 6 mm Hg) groups. Aortic regurgitation (AR) occurred more frequently in the PAVI group (mild: 42%, moderate: 8%) compared with the SAVR-ST (mild: 10%, moderate: 0%) and SAVR-SL (mild: 12%, moderate: 0%) groups (p < 0.0001). At follow-up, the mean gradient in the PAVI group remained lower (p < 0.001) than that of the SAVR-ST group, but was similar to that of the SAVR-SL group. The incidence of severe prosthesis-patient mismatch was significantly lower (p = 0.007) in the PAVI group (6%) compared with the SAVR-ST (28%) and SAVR-SL (20%) groups. However, the incidence of AR remained higher (p < 0.0001) in the PAVI group compared with the 2 other groups. sions rovided superior hemodynamic performance compared with the surgical bioprostheses in terms of transprosthetic gradient and prevention of severe prosthesis-patient mismatch, but was associated with a higher incidence of AR.
Keywords :
Hemodynamics , aortic valve replacement , Aortic stenosis , Heart valve prosthesis , percutaneous aortic valve implantation , Bioprosthesis
Journal title :
JACC (Journal of the American College of Cardiology)
Serial Year :
2009
Journal title :
JACC (Journal of the American College of Cardiology)
Record number :
1744579
Link To Document :
بازگشت