Providing patient progress feedback and clinical support tools to therapists: Is the therapeutic process of patients on-track to recovery enhanced in psychosomatic in-patient therapy under the conditions of routine practice?

AbstractObjectives vious studies of patients on-track to recovery (OT) involving therapists receiving only patient progress feedback without clinical support tools (CST) inconsistent results were found. Possible effects of combining patient progress feedback with CST on OT patients remain unclear. s ake (t1), 252 patients of two in-patient psychosomatic clinics were randomized either into the experimental group (EG) or the treatment-as-usual control group (CG). Both groups were monitored weekly using the self-report instruments “Outcome Questionnaire” (OQ-45) and “Assessment of Signal Cases” (ASC). Therapists received weekly patient progress feedback (OQ-45) and CST feedback (ASC) only for EG patients starting at the week following intake (t2). Patients who did not deviate negatively from expected recovery curves by at least one standard deviation were considered OT patients (N = 209; NEG = 111; NCG = 98). Since therapists received feedback at t2 for the first time, different patterns of change (OQ-45 scales) between the groups from t1 to t2, t2 to t3 (intake + two weeks), t2 to t4 (intake + three weeks), and t2 to t5 (last available OQ-45 score) were evaluated by multilevel models. s from t2 to t3, the EG improved significantly more on the OQ-45 symptom distress scale than the CG (p < 0.05; g = 0.12). sion ing patient progress feedback and CST to therapists did not substantially surpass treatment-as-usual for OT patients in this explorative study except for a very small time-limited enhancement of symptom change.