Title of article
Beyond Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol: Respective Contributions of Non–High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Levels, Triglycerides, and the Total Cholesterol/High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Ratio to Coronary Heart Disease Risk in Apparently Healt
Author/Authors
Arsenault، نويسنده , , Benoit J. and Rana، نويسنده , , Jamal S. and Stroes، نويسنده , , Erik S.G. and Després، نويسنده , , Jean-Pierre and Shah، نويسنده , , Prediman K. and Kastelein، نويسنده , , John J.P. and Wareham، نويسنده , , Nicholas J. and Boekholdt، نويسنده , , S. Matthijs and Khaw، نويسنده , , Kay-Tee، نويسنده ,
Issue Information
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2009
Pages
7
From page
35
To page
41
Abstract
Objectives
tudy was designed to test the hypothesis that at any low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) level, other lipid parameters such as non–high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) levels, triglyceride (TG) levels, and the total cholesterol (TC)/HDL-C are still associated with an increased coronary heart disease (CHD) risk.
ound
gh LDL-C is considered to be the primary target of lipid-lowering therapy, other parameters of the lipoprotein-lipid profile may more closely associated with CHD risk.
s
EPIC (European Prospective Investigation Into Cancer and Nutrition)-Norfolk prospective population study, 21,448 participants without diabetes or CHD between age 45 and 79 years were followed for 11.0 years. A total of 2,086 participants developed CHD during follow-up.
s
individuals with low LDL-C levels (<100 mg/dl), after adjustment for age, sex, smoking, systolic blood pressure, waist circumference, physical activity, and hormone replacement therapy (in women), those with non–HDL-C >130 mg/dl had a hazard ratio (HR) for future CHD of 1.84 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.12 to 3.04) when compared with those with non–HDL-C levels <130 mg/dl. In a similar model, individuals with TG levels >150 mg/dl had an HR of 1.63 (95% CI: 1.02 to 2.59) when compared with those with TG levels <150 mg/dl, and individuals with a TC/HDL-C ratio >5 had an HR of 2.19 (95% CI: 1.22 to 3.93) when compared with those with a TC/HDL-C ratio <5.
sions
s prospective study, independently of their plasma LDL-C levels, participants with high non–HDL-C levels, high TG levels, or with an elevated TC/HDL-C ratio were at increased CHD risk. CHD risk assessment algorithms as well as lipid targets of lipid-lowering trials may also need to consider other easily available parameters such as non–HDL-C.
Keywords
Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol , non–high-density lipoprotein cholesterol , Triglycerides , total to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio , Coronary Heart Disease
Journal title
JACC (Journal of the American College of Cardiology)
Serial Year
2009
Journal title
JACC (Journal of the American College of Cardiology)
Record number
1746334
Link To Document