Title of article :
Impact of Coronary Artery Calcium Scanning on Coronary Risk Factors and Downstream Testing: The EISNER (Early Identification of Subclinical Atherosclerosis by Noninvasive Imaging Research) Prospective Randomized Trial
Author/Authors :
Rozanski، نويسنده , , Alan and Gransar، نويسنده , , Heidi and Shaw، نويسنده , , Leslee J. and Kim، نويسنده , , Johanna and Miranda-Peats، نويسنده , , Lisa and Wong، نويسنده , , Nathan D. and Rana، نويسنده , , Jamal S. and Orakzai، نويسنده , , Raza and Hayes، نويسنده , , Sean W. and Friedman، نويسنده , , John D. R. Thomson، نويسنده , , Louise E.J. and Polk، نويسنده , , Donna and Min، نويسنده , , James and Bu، نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2011
Abstract :
Objectives
ducted a prospective randomized trial to compare the clinical impact of conventional risk factor modification to that associated with the addition of coronary artery calcium (CAC) scanning.
ound
gh CAC scanning predicts cardiac events, its impact on subsequent medical management and coronary artery disease risk is not known.
s
igned 2,137 volunteers to groups that either did undergo CAC scanning or did not undergo CAC scanning before risk factor counseling. The primary end point was 4-year change in coronary artery disease risk factors and Framingham Risk Score. We also compared the groups for differences in downstream medical resource utilization.
s
ed with the no-scan group, the scan group showed a net favorable change in systolic blood pressure (p = 0.02), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (p = 0.04), and waist circumference for those with increased abdominal girth (p = 0.01), and tendency to weight loss among overweight subjects (p = 0.07). While there was a mean rise in Framingham Risk Score (FRS) in the no-scan group, FRS remained static in the scan group (0.7 ± 5.1 vs. 0.002 ± 4.9, p = 0.003). Within the scan group, increasing baseline CAC score was associated with a dose-response improvement in systolic and diastolic blood pressure (p < 0.001), total cholesterol (p < 0.001), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (p < 0.001), triglycerides (p < 0.001), weight (p < 0.001), and Framingham Risk Score (p = 0.003). Downstream medical testing and costs in the scan group were comparable to those of the no-scan group, balanced by lower and higher resource utilization for subjects with normal CAC scans and CAC scores ≥400, respectively.
sions
ed with no scanning, randomization to CAC scanning was associated with superior coronary artery disease risk factor control without increasing downstream medical testing. Further study of CAC scanning, including pre-specified treatment recommendations, to assess its impact of cardiovascular outcomes is warranted. (Early Identification of Subclinical Atherosclerosis Using Non-Invasive Imaging Research [EISNER]; NCT00927693)
Keywords :
Coronary Artery Disease , Coronary calcification , risk factors , Prevention
Journal title :
JACC (Journal of the American College of Cardiology)
Journal title :
JACC (Journal of the American College of Cardiology)