Author/Authors :
Gonzalo، نويسنده , , Nieve and Escaned، نويسنده , , Javier and Alfonso، نويسنده , , Fernando and Nolte، نويسنده , , Christian and Rodriguez، نويسنده , , Vera and Jimenez-Quevedo، نويسنده , , Pilar and Baٌuelos، نويسنده , , Camino and Fernلndez-Ortiz، نويسنده , , Antonia and Garcia، نويسنده , , Eulogio and Hernandez-Antolin، نويسنده , , Rosana and Macaya، نويسنده , , Carlos، نويسنده ,
Abstract :
Objectives
udy sought to assess the diagnostic efficiency of optical coherence tomography (OCT) in identifying hemodynamically severe coronary stenoses as determined by fractional flow reserve (FFR). Concomitant OCT and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) area measurements were performed in a subgroup of patients to compare the diagnostic efficiency of both techniques.
ound
lue of OCT to determine stenosis severity remains unsettled.
s
one stenoses with intermediate angiographic severity were studied in 56 patients. Stenoses were labeled as severe if FFR ≤0.80. OCT interrogation was performed in all cases, with concomitant IVUS imaging in 47 cases.
s
raphic stenosis severity was 50.9 ± 8% diameter stenosis with 1.28 ± 0.3 mm minimal lumen diameter. FFR was ≤0.80 in 28 (45.9%) stenoses. An overall moderate diagnostic efficiency of OCT was found (area under the curve [AUC]: 0.74; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.61 to 0.84), with sensitivity/specificity of 82%/63% associated with an optimal cutoff value of 1.95 mm2. Comparison of the results in patients with simultaneous IVUS and OCT imaging revealed no significant differences in the diagnostic efficiency of OCT (AUC: 0.70; 95% CI: 0.55 to 0.83) and IVUS (AUC. 0.63; 95% CI: 0.47 to 0.77; p = 0.19). Sensitivity/specificity for IVUS was 67%/65% for an optimal cutoff value of 2.36 mm2. In the subgroup of small vessels (reference diameter <3 mm) OCT showed a significantly better diagnostic efficiency (AUC: 0.77; 95% CI: 0.60 to 0.89) than IVUS (AUC: 0.63; 95% CI: 0.46 to 0.78) to identify functionally significant stenoses (p = 0.04).
sions
s a moderate diagnostic efficiency in identifying hemodynamically severe coronary stenoses. Although OCT seems slightly superior to IVUS for this purpose (particularly in vessels <3 mm), its low specificity precludes its use as a substitute of FFR for functional stenosis assessment.
Keywords :
Fractional flow reserve , functional assessment , intermediate coronary stenosis , optical coherence tomography , intravascular ultrasound