Title of article :
Reproducibility of Echocardiographic Techniques for Sequential Assessment of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction and Volumes: Application to Patients Undergoing Cancer Chemotherapy
Author/Authors :
Thavendiranathan، نويسنده , , Paaladinesh and Grant، نويسنده , , Andrew D. and Negishi، نويسنده , , Tomoko and Plana، نويسنده , , Juan Carlos and Popovi?، نويسنده , , Zoran B. and Marwick، نويسنده , , Thomas H.، نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2013
Pages :
8
From page :
77
To page :
84
Abstract :
Objectives m of this study was to identify the best echocardiographic method for sequential quantification of left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF) and volumes in patients undergoing cancer chemotherapy. ound ons regarding cancer therapy are based on temporal changes of EF. However the method for EF measurement with the lowest temporal variability is unknown. s ected patients in whom stable function in the face of chemotherapy for breast cancer was defined by stability of global longitudinal strain (GLS) at up to 5 time points (baseline, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months). In this way, changes in EF were considered to reflect temporal variability of measurements rather than cardiotoxicity. A comprehensive echocardiogram consisting of 2-dimensional (2D) and 3-dimensional (3D) acquisitions with and without contrast administration was performed at each time point. Stable LV function was defined as normal GLS (≤−16.0%) at each examination. The EF and volumes were measured with 2D-biplane Simpsonʹs method, 2D-triplane, and 3-dimensional echocardiography (3DE) by 2 investigators blinded to any clinical data. Inter-, intra-, and test-retest variability were assessed in a subgroup. Variability was assessed by analysis of variance and compared with Leveneʹs or t test. s 56 patients (all female, 54 ± 13 years of age), noncontrast 3D EF, end-diastolic volume, and end-systolic volume had significantly lower temporal variability than all other methods. Contrast only decreased the temporal variability of LV end-diastolic volume measurements by the 2D biplane method. Our data suggest that a temporal variability in EF of 0.06 might occur with noncontrast 3DE due to physiological differences and measurement variability, whereas this might be >0.10 with 2D methods. Overall, 3DE also had the best intra- and inter-observer as well as test-retest variability. sions trast 3DE was the most reproducible technique for LVEF and LV volume measurements over 1 year of follow-up.
Keywords :
interobserver variability , interobserver test re-test variability , longitudinal variability , 3D echocardiography , chemotherapy
Journal title :
JACC (Journal of the American College of Cardiology)
Serial Year :
2013
Journal title :
JACC (Journal of the American College of Cardiology)
Record number :
1755455
Link To Document :
بازگشت