Title of article :
Risk Factor Control for Coronary Artery Disease Secondary Prevention in Large Randomized Trials
Author/Authors :
Farkouh، نويسنده , , Michael E. and Boden، نويسنده , , William E. and Bittner، نويسنده , , Vera and Muratov، نويسنده , , Victoria and Hartigan، نويسنده , , Pamela and Ogdie، نويسنده , , May and Bertolet، نويسنده , , Marnie and Mathewkutty، نويسنده , , Shiny and Teo، نويسنده , , Koon and Maron، نويسنده , , David J. and Sethi، نويسنده , , Sanjum S. and Domanski، نويسنده , , Michael and Frye، نويسنده , , Robert L. and Fuster، نويسنده , , Valentin، نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2013
Abstract :
Objectives
tudy evaluated data from 3 federally funded trials that focused on optimal medical therapy to determine if formalized attempts at risk factor control within clinical trials are effective in achieving guideline-driven treatment goals for diabetic patients with coronary artery disease (CAD).
ound
e clear evidence of benefit for CAD secondary prevention, the level of risk factor control in clinical practice has been disappointing.
s
ained data from the COURAGE (Clinical Outcomes Utilizing Revascularization and Aggressive Drug Evaluation) diabetes subgroup, (n = 766 of 2,287), the BARI 2D (Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation 2 Diabetes) trial (n = 2,368), and the FREEDOM (Comparison of Two Treatments for Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease in Individuals With Diabetes) trial (n = 1,900) to evaluate the proportion of patients achieving guideline-based, protocol-driven treatment targets for systolic blood pressure, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, smoking cessation, and hemoglobin A1c. The primary outcome measure was the proportion of diabetic CAD patients meeting all 4 pre-specified targets at 1 year after enrollment.
s
oled data include 5,034 diabetic patients. The percentages of patients achieving the 1-year low-density lipoprotein cholesterol targets compared with baseline increased from 55% to 77% in COURAGE, from 59% to 75% in BARI 2D, and from 34% to 42% in FREEDOM. Although similar improved trends were seen for systolic blood pressure, glycemic control, and smoking cessation, only 18% of the COURAGE diabetes subgroup, 23% of BARI 2D patients, and 8% of FREEDOM patients met all 4 pre-specified treatment targets at 1 year of follow-up.
sions
ificant proportion of diabetic CAD patients fail to achieve pre-specified targets for 4 major modifiable cardiovascular risk factors in clinical trials. We conclude that fundamentally new thinking is needed to explore approaches to achieve optimal secondary prevention treatment goals. (Clinical Outcomes Utilizing Revascularization and Aggressive Drug Evaluation; NCT00007657) (Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation 2 Diabetes [BARI 2D]; NCT00006305) (Comparison of Two Treatments for Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease in Individuals With Diabetes [FREEDOM]; NCT00086450)
Keywords :
Clinical trials , Secondary prevention , Risk Factor
Journal title :
JACC (Journal of the American College of Cardiology)
Journal title :
JACC (Journal of the American College of Cardiology)