Author/Authors :
Torabi، Amir نويسنده Khorasan Institute of Higher Education, Mashhad, Iran , , Adine Ahari، Amin نويسنده 1 Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Khorasan University, Mashhad, Iran , , Karsaz، Ali نويسنده Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Khorasan University, Mashhad, Iran , , Kazemi، Seyyed Hossin نويسنده Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Khorasan University, Mashhad, Iran ,
Abstract :
This paper exhibits a comparative assessment based on time response specification performance between modern
and classical controller for a pitch control system of an aircraft system. The dynamic modeling of pitch
control system is considered on the design of an autopilot that controls the pitch angle. It starts with a derivation
of a suitable mathematical model to describe the dynamics of an aircraft. For getting close to actual conditions
the white noise disturbance is applied to the system. In this paper, it is assumed that the model pitch control system
is not available. So using the identification system and Box-Jenkins model estimator we identify the pitch control
system. System’s identification is a procedure for accurately characterizing the dynamic response behavior of a
complete aircraft, of a subsystem, or of an individual component from measured data. To study the effectiveness of
the controllers, the LQR Controller and PID Controller and fuzzy controller is developed for controlling the
pitch angle of an aircraft system. Simulation results for the response of pitch controller are presented instep’s
response. Finally, the performances of pitch control systems are investigated and analyzed based on common
criteria of step’s response in order to identify which control strategy delivers better performance with respect to the
desired pitch angle. It is found from simulation that the fuzzy controller gives the best performance compared to
PID and LQR controller.