Title of article :
Triple Therapy With Aspirin, Prasugrel, and Vitamin K Antagonists in Patients With Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation and an Indication for Oral Anticoagulation
Author/Authors :
Sarafoff، نويسنده , , Nikolaus and Martischnig، نويسنده , , Amadea and Wealer، نويسنده , , Jill and Mayer، نويسنده , , Katharina and Mehilli، نويسنده , , Julinda and Sibbing، نويسنده , , Dirk and Kastrati، نويسنده , , Adnan، نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2013
Pages :
7
From page :
2060
To page :
2066
Abstract :
Objectives tudy sought to evaluate whether prasugrel may serve as an alternative to clopidogrel in patients with triple therapy. ound imately 10% of patients who receive dual antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention have an indication for oral anticoagulation and are thus treated with triple therapy. The standard adenosine diphosphate receptor blocker in this setting is clopidogrel. Data regarding prasugrel as part of triple therapy are not available. s lyzed a consecutive series of 377 patients who underwent drug-eluting stent implantation and had an indication for oral anticoagulation between February 2009 and December 2011 and were treated with a 6-month regimen of aspirin and oral anticoagulation with either prasugrel or clopidogrel. The primary endpoint was a composite of Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) major and minor bleeding at 6 months. The secondary endpoint was a composite of death, myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, or definite stent thrombosis. s -one patients (5.6%) received prasugrel instead of clopidogrel. These patients had a higher-risk profile at baseline, and the majority had high platelet reactivity to clopidogrel. TIMI major and minor bleeding occurred significantly more often in the prasugrel compared with the clopidogrel group (6 [28.6%) vs. 24 [6.7%]; unadjusted hazard ratio (HR): 4.6, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.9 to 11.4], p < 0.001; adjusted HR: 3.2, 95% CI: 1.1 to 9.1], p = 0.03). There was no significant difference regarding the combined ischemic secondary endpoint (2 [9.5%] vs. 25 [7.0%]; unadjusted HR: 1.4, 95% CI: 0.3 to 6.1], p = 0.61). sions findings suggest that substitution of prasugrel for clopidogrel in patients needing triple therapy increases the risk of bleeding. However, specific randomized trials are needed to define the role of newer adenosine diphosphate receptor antagonists in this setting.
Keywords :
high platelet reactivity , Clopidogrel , vitamin K antagonist , prasugrel , Aspirin , drug-eluting stent(s)
Journal title :
JACC (Journal of the American College of Cardiology)
Serial Year :
2013
Journal title :
JACC (Journal of the American College of Cardiology)
Record number :
1756646
Link To Document :
بازگشت