Title of article :
Association of the Recovery of Objective Abnormal Cerebral Perfusion With Neurocognitive Improvement After Carotid Revascularization
Author/Authors :
Huang، نويسنده , , Ching-Chang and Chen، نويسنده , , Ying-Hsien and Lin، نويسنده , , Mao-Shin and Lin، نويسنده , , Cheng-Hsin and Li، نويسنده , , Hung-Yuan and Chiu، نويسنده , , Ming-Jang and Chao، نويسنده , , Chi-Chao and Wu، نويسنده , , Yen-Wen and Chen، نويسنده , , Ya-Fang and Lee، نويسنده , , Jen-Kuang and Wang، نويسنده , , Ming-Jiuh and Chen، نويسنده , , Ming-Fong and Kao، نويسنده , , Hsien-Li، نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2013
Pages :
7
From page :
2503
To page :
2509
Abstract :
Objectives tudy sought to report the effect of carotid artery stenting (CS) on neurocognitive function (NCF) in patients with severe carotid artery occlusive disease, depending on baseline brain perfusion status. ound fect of CS on NCF has been controversial. s spectively enrolled 61 patients with carotid artery disease (22 with occlusion, 39 with severe stenosis) in whom CS was attempted. Computed tomography perfusion and NCF assessments including Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), Alzheimer Disease Assessment Scale–Cognitive subscale (ADAS-Cog), verbal fluency, and Color Trails Test Parts 1 and 2 were applied before and 3 months after intervention. s sful recanalization was achieved in 14 of 22 occlusion patients (64%) and in all 39 severe stenosis patients. Two cases were excluded due to procedural cerebral complications. The patients were divided into 3 groups: group 1 (n = 8) consisted of patients with abnormal baseline ipsilateral cerebral perfusion in whom CS failed; group 2 (n = 33) consisted of patients with abnormal baseline ipsilateral cerebral perfusion in whom CS was successful; and group 3 (n = 19) consisted of patients without abnormal baseline ipsilateral cerebral perfusion in whom CS was successful. The demographics and baseline NCF were similar among groups. Only in group 2 was there significant improvement in ADAS-Cog (pre-procedure median [interquartile range]: 6 [4 to 9] vs. post-procedure: 5 [3 to 7], p = 0.002), MMSE (pre-procedure: 27 [25 to 28] vs. post-procedure: 28 [25 to 29], p = 0.004) and Color Trails Test Part 1 (pre-procedure: 100 [78.5 to 136.5] s vs. post-procedure: 97 [60 to 128.5] s, p = 0.003) after CS. Significant difference in changes from baseline was observed only in the Color Trails Test Part 1 among groups (group 1 vs. 2 vs. 3: 1.5 [−14 to 11.5] vs. −12.5 [−36.5 to 0.5] vs. −0.5 [−11 to 27], p = 0.0159). Significant correlation between the change of ipsilateral brain perfusion and MMSE (r = −0.33, p = 0.01) was also identified. sions sful CS for severe carotid stenosis/occlusion improves NCF, but only in patients with objective baseline abnormal cerebral perfusion.
Keywords :
Carotid stenting , Carotid stenosis , neurocognitive function , Brain perfusion
Journal title :
JACC (Journal of the American College of Cardiology)
Serial Year :
2013
Journal title :
JACC (Journal of the American College of Cardiology)
Record number :
1756847
Link To Document :
بازگشت