Title of article :
Survival Effects of Inferior Vena Cava Filter in Patients With Acute Symptomatic Venous Thromboembolism and a Significant Bleeding Risk
Author/Authors :
Muriel، نويسنده , , Alfonso and Jiménez، نويسنده , , David and Aujesky، نويسنده , , Drahomir and Bertoletti، نويسنده , , Laurent and Decousus، نويسنده , , Herve and Laporte، نويسنده , , Silvy and Mismetti، نويسنده , , Patrick and Muٌoz، نويسنده , , Francisco J. and Yusen، نويسنده , , Roger and Monreal، نويسنده , , Manuel، نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2014
Pages :
9
From page :
1675
To page :
1683
Abstract :
Objectives rpose of this study was to investigate the survival effects of inferior vena cava filters in patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE) who had a significant bleeding risk. ound fectiveness of inferior vena cava filter use among patients with acute symptomatic VTE and known significant bleeding risk remains unclear. s s prospective cohort study of patients with acute VTE identified from the RIETE (Computerized Registry of Patients With Venous Thromboembolism), we assessed the association between inferior vena cava filter insertion for known significant bleeding risk and the outcomes of all-cause mortality, pulmonary embolism (PE)-related mortality, and VTE rates through 30 days after the initiation of VTE treatment. Propensity score matching was used to adjust for the likelihood of receiving a filter. s 40,142 eligible patients who had acute symptomatic VTE, 371 underwent filter placement because of known significant bleeding risk. A total of 344 patients treated with a filter were matched with 344 patients treated without a filter. Propensity score–matched pairs showed a nonsignificant trend toward lower risk of all-cause death for filter insertion compared with no insertion (6.6% vs. 10.2%; p = 0.12). The risk-adjusted PE-related mortality rate was lower for filter insertion than no insertion (1.7% vs. 4.9%; p = 0.03). Risk-adjusted recurrent VTE rates were higher for filter insertion than for no insertion (6.1% vs. 0.6%; p < 0.001). sions ients presenting with VTE and with a significant bleeding risk, inferior vena cava filter insertion compared with anticoagulant therapy was associated with a lower risk of PE-related death and a higher risk of recurrent VTE. However, study design limitations do not imply a causal relationship between filter insertion and outcome.
Keywords :
Venous thromboembolism , pulmonary embolism , vena cava filter , deep vein thrombosis , Survival , Prognosis
Journal title :
JACC (Journal of the American College of Cardiology)
Serial Year :
2014
Journal title :
JACC (Journal of the American College of Cardiology)
Record number :
1758416
Link To Document :
بازگشت