Title of article :
Safety of Computed Tomography in Patients With Cardiac Rhythm Management Devices: Assessment of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration Advisory in Clinical Practice
Author/Authors :
Hussein، نويسنده , , Ayman A. and Abutaleb، نويسنده , , Ameer and Jeudy، نويسنده , , Jean and Phelan، نويسنده , , Timothy and Patel، نويسنده , , Ronak and Shkullaku، نويسنده , , Melsjan and Siddiqi، نويسنده , , Faisal and See، نويسنده , , Vincent and Saliaris، نويسنده , , Anastasios and Shorofsky، نويسنده , , Stephen R. and Dickfeld، نويسنده , , Timm، نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2014
Abstract :
Objectives
ess the safety of computed tomography (CT) imaging in patients with cardiac rhythm management (CRM) devices, which was subject to an advisory from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2008.
ound
A warned about potential interference of CT imaging with CRM devices and made recommendations for clinical practice despite only limited evidence.
s
6 CT scans that involved direct radiation exposure of CRM devices (332 defibrillators, 184 pacemakers) at 2 large-volume centers between July 2000 and May 2010 were included. The primary outcome was a composite endpoint of death, bradycardia or tachycardia requiring termination of the scan or an immediate intervention, unplanned hospital admission, reprogramming of the device, inappropriate defibrillator shocks, or device replacement/revision thought to be due to CT imaging. Significant changes in device parameters were sought as a secondary outcome (control group 4:1 ratio).
s
in finding was that none of the CTs were associated with the primary outcome. With serial device interrogations, there were no differences in changes in battery voltage or lead parameters between devices exposed to radiation and their controls. Potentially significant changes in device parameters were observed in a small group of devices (both the CT group and control group), but no definitive link to CT was confirmed, and there were no associated clinical consequences.
sions
ndings suggest that the presence of CRM devices should not delay or result in cancellation of clinically indicated CT imaging procedures, and provide evidence that would be helpful when the FDA advisory is re-evaluated.
Keywords :
computed tomography , FDA advisory , implantable cardioverter-defibrillator , Pacemakers
Journal title :
JACC (Journal of the American College of Cardiology)
Journal title :
JACC (Journal of the American College of Cardiology)