• Title of article

    Comparison of two techniques for the screening of human tumor cells in mouse blood: Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) versus laser scanning cytometry (LSC)

  • Author/Authors

    Ulrika M. and Nehmann، نويسنده , , N. and Wicklein، نويسنده , , D. and Schumacher، نويسنده , , U. C. Muller، نويسنده , , R.، نويسنده ,

  • Issue Information
    روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2010
  • Pages
    8
  • From page
    489
  • To page
    496
  • Abstract
    Summary rmation of metastases is often investigated in xenografted human tumors in mice and the need arises to detect disseminated human tumor cells in small volumes of mouse blood. Two techniques, namely quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) and laser scanning cytometry (LSC), were compared for screening of 100 μl blood samples from immunodeficient mice spiked with a defined number of human HT29 colon carcinoma cells. With both techniques (qRT-PCR for amplifying of human Alu-sequences and LSC techniques for screening of fluorescence labelled cells), it was possible to detect single disseminated human tumor cells. Using the qRT-PCR technique, a recovery rate of nearly 100% was found when 10–10 000 cells were added to 100 μl blood. In contrast, the median recovery rate of the LSC technique varied between 20% (10 cells/100 μl blood) and 7.5% (10 000 cells/100 μl blood). Thus, it is advisable to quantify the number of human tumor cells in mouse blood by qRT-PCR and to use LSC for phenotyping of disseminated tumor cells only.
  • Keywords
    alu , Light cycler , Real-Time PCR , Laser scanning cytometry , single cell , metastasis
  • Journal title
    Acta Histochemica
  • Serial Year
    2010
  • Journal title
    Acta Histochemica
  • Record number

    1759858