• Title of article

    Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in head and neck cancer: Should it be revisited?

  • Author/Authors

    Specenier، نويسنده , , Pol M. and Vermorken، نويسنده , , Jan B.، نويسنده ,

  • Issue Information
    روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2007
  • Pages
    12
  • From page
    166
  • To page
    177
  • Abstract
    Locally advanced SCCHN (LA-SCCHN) is generally treated by a combination of chemotherapy, irradiation and/or surgery. Timing of the chemotherapy has for long been a matter of debate but concurrent chemoradiation was widely adopted as standard of care for locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck after the publication of a large meta-analysis which demonstrated that concurrent chemoradiation confers an absolute survival benefit of 8% at 2 and 5 years. Induction chemotherapy has some appealing advantages including the opportunity of assessing tumor response and selecting the patients who are candidates for organ preservation. The cisplatin–fluorouracil combination has been the induction regimen of choice for two decades but has recently been superseded by a combination of cisplatin, fluorouracil and a taxane which can be considered the standard regimen when induction chemotherapy is appropriate. le large randomized trials designed to compare sequential induction, i.e., chemotherapy followed by CRT to CRT alone are currently underway. New challenges are the integration of targeted therapies into the current treatment strategies and the identification of prognostic biomarkers and of factors predicting the response to treatment which would help to select patients who are likely to benefit most from induction chemotherapy.
  • Keywords
    Neoadjuvant chemotherapy , Head and neck cancer , Locally advanced head and neck cancer , Larynx preservation , Induction Chemotherapy
  • Journal title
    Cancer Letters
  • Serial Year
    2007
  • Journal title
    Cancer Letters
  • Record number

    1810815