Author/Authors :
Mesgarani ، Abbas نويسنده Assistant Professor, Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol-Iran. , , Haghanifar ، Sina نويسنده . Associate Professor, Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol-Iran , , Ehsani، Maryam Maryam نويسنده Dental Materials Research Center, School of Dentistry, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran. Ehsani, Maryam Maryam , Dokhte Yaghub، Samereh نويسنده Dental School, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran; , , Bijani ، Ali نويسنده Non-Communicable Pediatric Diseases Research Center, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran ,
Abstract :
Introduction: External root resorption (ERR) is associated with physiological and pathological
dissolution of mineralized tissues by clastic cells and radiography is one of the most important
methods in its diagnosis. The aim of this experimental study was to evaluate the accuracy of
conventional intraoral radiography (CR) in comparison with digital radiographic techniques, i.e.
charge-coupled device (CCD) and photo-stimulable phosphor (PSP) sensors, in detection of
ERR. Methods and Materials: This study was performed on 80 extracted human mandibular
premolars. After taking separate initial periapical radiographs with CR technique, CCD and PSP
sensors, the artificial defects resembling ERR with variable sizes were created in apical half of the
mesial, distal and buccal surfaces of the teeth. Ten teeth were used as control samples without
any resorption. The radiographs were then repeated with 2 different exposure times and the
images were observed by 3 observers. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 17 and chi-squared
and Cohen’s Kappa tests with 95% confidence interval (CI=95%). Result: The CCD had the
highest percentage of correct assessment compared to the CR and PSP sensors, although the
difference was not significant (P=0.39). It was shown that the higher dosage of radiation increases
the accuracy of diagnosis; however, it was only significant for CCD sensor (P=0.02). Also, the
accuracy of diagnosis increased with the increase in the size of lesion (P=0.001). Conclusion:
Statistically significant difference was not observed for accurate detection of ERR by conventional
and digital radiographic techniques.