Title of article :
Comparison of Antibacterial Effect of Fluoride and Chlorhexidine on Two Cariogenic Bacteria: An in Vitro Study
Author/Authors :
Poureslami ، HR نويسنده Oral & Dental Diseases Research Center, Department of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran , , Barkam، F نويسنده School of Dentistry, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran , , Poureslami، P نويسنده School of Dentistry, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran , , Salari، Z نويسنده Oral & Dental Diseases Research Center, Department of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran , , Salari، S نويسنده Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran ,
Issue Information :
فصلنامه با شماره پیاپی 1 سال 2014
Abstract :
Statement of problem: Dental plaque is the main source for dental caries and there is
no proper vaccine that can affect dental plaques.
Objectives: Daily use of an efficient anti-plaque product can be very beneficial
in plaque control and, thus, prevention of caries. This study aims to evaluate the
antibacterial effects of four products of Chlorhexidine and Fluoride on two types of
cariogenic bacteria.
Materials and Methods: In this in vitro study, the antibacterial effect of Chlorhexidine
and Fluoride (gel and solution) against Streptococci Sanguis and Sobrinus was
evaluated. Chlorhexidine gluconate 1% gel (Corosodyl, France), Chlorhexidine
gluconate 2% solution (Consepsis, Ultradent, US), Sodium fluoride 0.2% solution
(Oral-B, US) and Acidulated Phosphate Fluoride 1.23% gel ( Denti-Care, Canada)
were used. The disc diffusion method was used for testing bacterial sensitivity. The
data were analyzed using paired t-test and Chi-square test.
Results: In comparison with the negative control, each of the four gels and solutions
showed antibacterial effects but the effects were not statistically significant for fluoride
solution (P=0.217). For S. Sobrinus, the mean diameter of inhibition zone around the
discs coated with fluoride gel (F g), fluoride solution (F s), Chlorhexidine gel (CHX g)
and Chlorhexidine solution (CHX s) were 19, 9, 21.5 and 27.5mm, respectively. For
S. Sanguis, the mean diameter of inhibition zone around the discs coated with F g,
F s, CHX g and CHX s were 17, 11, 17 and 25mm, respectively. CHX s had the most
effect on both bacteria and F s had the least. CHX g and F g were less effective than
CHX s, respectively.
Conclusion: The results demonstrated that 2% CHX s and 1.23% F g can be effective
on inhibition of the growth of some of cariogenic bacteria. Therefore, these agents can
be used in the prevention of Early Childhood Caries.
Journal title :
Journal of Dental Biomaterials
Journal title :
Journal of Dental Biomaterials