Title of article :
Importance of using comparative genomic hybridization to improve detection of chromosomal changes in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia
Author/Authors :
Jaro?ov?، نويسنده , , Marie and Holzerov?، نويسنده , , Milena and Jedli، نويسنده , , Kat?ina and Mih?l، نويسنده , , Vladim??r and Zuna، نويسنده , , Jan and Stary¥، نويسنده , , Jan and Posp???ilov?، نويسنده , , Dagmar and Zemanov?، نويسنده , , Zuzana and Trka، نويسنده , , Jan and Bla?ek، نويسنده , , Jan and Pikalov?، نويسنده , , Zuzana and Indr?k، نويسنده , , Karel، نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2000
Pages :
9
From page :
114
To page :
122
Abstract :
We used comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) and conventional cytogenetics (CC) to define chromosomal changes and to evaluate the usefulness of CGH in 65 patients having childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Subsequently, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) was used to evaluate the CGH and cytogenetic results. Comparative genomic hybridization revealed DNA copy number changes in 49 (75%) patients (including 7 patients with unsuccessful cytogenetics and 2 patients with normal karyotype). A total of 85 losses and 195 gains were detected. The most commonly gained chromosomes were 21 (35%), X (31%), 18 (27%), 10 (26%), 6 (25%), 17 (25%), 4 (23%), and 14 (22%). Losses were most frequently observed on chromosomes 9p (18%) and 12p (11%). Other losses were detected on chromosomes 13q (9%), 6q (9%), 7p (8%), and chromosome X (6%). Conventional cytogenetics revealed chromosomal changes in 53 (82%) patients. The employment of CGH and FISH together with CC analysis revealed chromosomal changes in 62 (95%) of the childhood ALL patients investigated. The CGH completed CC results in 36 patients; in 9 patients, the changes escaped detection without using CGH. The results of our study were compared to 6 other CGH studies previously reported. Our observations underline the benefits of supplementing routine cytogenetic investigation in childhood ALL by FISH and CGH, because small unbalanced changes may escape detection when conventional cytogenetics is the only diagnostic method used.
Journal title :
Cancer Genetics and Cytogenetics
Serial Year :
2000
Journal title :
Cancer Genetics and Cytogenetics
Record number :
1823273
Link To Document :
بازگشت