Title of article
Semiquantitative perfusion combined with diffusion-weighted MR imaging in pre-operative evaluation of endometrial carcinoma: Results in a group of 57 patients
Author/Authors
Ippolito، نويسنده , , Davide and Cadonici، نويسنده , , Anna and Bonaffini، نويسنده , , Pietro Andrea and Minutolo، نويسنده , , Orazio and Casiraghi، نويسنده , , Alessandra and Perego، نويسنده , , Patrizia and Sironi، نويسنده , , Sandro، نويسنده ,
Issue Information
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2014
Pages
9
From page
464
To page
472
Abstract
AbstractPurpose
luate the semiquantitative DCE and quantitative DWI parameters in endometrial cancer, in order to assess the presence of neoplastic tissue and normal myometrium and to ascertain a potential relationship with tumor grade.
s and materials
l of 57 patients with biopsy-proven endometrial adenocarcinoma who underwent MR imaging examination for staging purposes were retrospectively evaluated. Imaging protocol included multiplanar T1- and T2-weighted TSE, DCE T1-weighted (THRIVE; 0, 30, 90 and 120 seconds after intravenous injection of gadolinium) and DWIBS sequences (b values = 0 and 1000 mm2/s). Color perfusion and ADC maps were automatically generated on dedicated software. Relative enhancement (RE, %), maximum enhancement (ME, %), maximum relative enhancement (MRE, %), time to peak (TTP, s) and mean apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) were calculated by manually drawing a region of interest (ROI) both on the neoplastic tissue and the normal myometrium. Histopathology was used as reference standard.
s
athological analysis confirmed the presence of endometrial carcinoma in all patients. Neoplastic tissue demonstrated significantly lower (P < 0.001) values of RE (%) 63.92 ± 35.68; ME (%) 864.91 ± 429.54 and MRE (%) 75.97 ± 38.26 as compared to normal myometrium (RE (%) 151.43 ± 55.99; ME (%) 1800.73 ± 721.32; MRE (%) 158.28 ± 54.05). TTP was significantly higher (P < 0.05) in tumor lesion (385.51 ± 1630.27 vs 195.44 ± 78.69). Mean ADC value of neoplastic tissue (775.09 ± ?220.73 × 10− 3 mm2/s) was significantly lower (P < 0.05) than in myometrium (1602.37 ± 378.54 × 10− 3 mm2/s). The analysis of perfusion and diffusion parameters classified according to tumor grades, showed a statistically significant difference only for RE (P = 0.043) and ME (P = 0.007).
sions
ion parameters and mean ADC differ significantly between endometrial cancer and normal myometrium, potentially reflecting the different microscopical features of cellularity and vascularity; however a significant relationship with tumor grade was not found in our series.
Keywords
Endometrial Cancer , perfusion imaging , STAGING , T1 contrast sequences , Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Journal title
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Serial Year
2014
Journal title
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Record number
1834147
Link To Document