Title of article :
Cathepsin L in glioma progression: Comparison with cathepsin B
Author/Authors :
Strojnik، نويسنده , , Tadej and Kavalar، نويسنده , , Rajko and Trinkaus، نويسنده , , Miha and Lah، نويسنده , , Tamara T.، نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2005
Abstract :
Objective: Lysosomal cysteine cathepsins have been implicated in tumor progression. This study is aimed to reveal differential expression and compare the prognostic significance of cathepsins B and L in glioma patients. Methods: The histological slides of 82 patients with primary astrocytic tumors were reviewed. We evaluated the immunostaining of the cathepsins in tumor and endothelial cells. Results: Cathepsins B and L stained positive in 98 and 88% of cases, respectively. The total score was significantly higher in malignant than in benign tumors, both for cathepsin B (p < 0.001) and for cathepsin L (p < 0.01). The IHC score in endothelial cells in the malignant group was significantly higher only for cathepsin B (p < 0.0001). Survival analysis indicated that in contrast to the prognostic significance of total cathepsin B and endothelial cells associated cathepsin B for shorter patients’ survival, the prognostic role of cathepsin L was not confirmed. Conclusion: Cathepsin L is preferentially expressed in tumor cells, increasing with glioma progression, but is not significantly associated with new vasculature of glioblastoma. In contrast to cathepsin B, cathepsin L has no prognostic impact, suggesting different roles of the two cathepsins in glioma progression.
Keywords :
adjuvant therapy , Predictor for survival , Angiogenesis , tumor markers , Immunohistochemical analysis , cathepsin B , cathepsin L , Astrocytic tumor , Glioma , Malignant tumor cells , Cysteine proteinases , Prognostic markers , Brain tumor invasion
Journal title :
Cancer Detection and Prevention
Journal title :
Cancer Detection and Prevention