Title of article :
Radiotherapeutic management of brain metastases: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Author/Authors :
Tsao، نويسنده , , May N. and Lloyd، نويسنده , , Nancy S. and Wong، نويسنده , , Rebecca K.S. and Rakovitch، نويسنده , , Eileen and Chow، نويسنده , , Edward and Laperriere، نويسنده , , Normand، نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2005
Pages :
18
From page :
256
To page :
273
Abstract :
SummaryBackground nagement of brain metastases is a significant health care problem. An estimated 20–40% of cancer patients will develop metastatic cancer to the brain during the course of their illness. s ematic review of randomized trials on adult cancer patients with single or multiple brain metastases from cancer of any histology was conducted. Eligible studies investigated external beam radiotherapy or radiosurgery in one of the study arms. Outcomes of interest included survival, intracranial progression-free duration, response of brain metastases to therapy, quality of life, symptom control, neurological function, and toxicity. s -seven trials were included in this systematic review of the evidence. Pooled results from three randomized trials of surgical excision combined with whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) showed no improvement in overall survival as compared to WBRT alone in patients with single brain metastasis. ndomized study of postoperative WBRT following excision of a single brain metastasis versus surgery alone detected a significant reduction in intracranial tumour recurrence rates but no corresponding difference in overall survival. rials of altered dose-fractionation schedules compared to a standard control fractionation schedule (3000 cGy in 10 fractions) of WBRT showed no difference in probability of survival at 6 months. dition of radiosensitizers, as assessed in five trials, did not confer additional benefit to WBRT in terms of overall survival or the frequency of brain metastases response. trials examined the use of WBRT and radiosurgery boost versus WBRT alone in selected patients with brain metastases. Overall survival did not improve for patients with multiple brain metastases. However, one trial reported an improvement in survival for patients with single brain metastasis treated with WBRT and radiosurgery boost. der randomized trial examined the use of WBRT versus supportive care alone (using oral prednisone). Results were not conclusive. sion tients with a single brain metastasis, good performance status, and minimal or no evidence of extracranial disease, surgical excision and postoperative WBRT improves survival (as compared to WBRT alone). There may be a small survival advantage associated with the use of radiosurgery boost and WBRT as compared to WBRT alone in selected patients with a single brain metastasis. There is no difference in overall survival or in neurologic function improvement with the use of altered whole brain dose-fractionation schedules as compared to standard fractionation schedules (3000 cGy in 10 fractions or 2000 cGy in 5 fractions). There is no survival benefit associated with the use of radiosurgery boost and WBRT versus WBRT alone in patients with multiple brain metastases. Currently, neither chemotherapy nor radiosensitizers show a clear benefit in the objective parameters of survival and progression-free survival. For patients with poor performance status and active extracranial disease, steroids and supportive care are an option.
Keywords :
radiation , systematic review , Brain metastases , META-ANALYSIS
Journal title :
Cancer Treatment Reviews
Serial Year :
2005
Journal title :
Cancer Treatment Reviews
Record number :
1834659
Link To Document :
بازگشت