Title of article :
Relationship between different indices of exercise capacity and clinical measures in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Author/Authors :
Oga، نويسنده , , Toru and Nishimura، نويسنده , , Koichi and Tsukino، نويسنده , , Mitsuhiro and Hajiro، نويسنده , , Takashi and Ikeda، نويسنده , , Akihiko and Mishima، نويسنده , , Michiaki، نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2002
Pages :
8
From page :
374
To page :
381
Abstract :
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to make comparisons between different types of exercise tests used in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) to better interpret the results and to select the most suitable testing procedure. Therefore, we evaluated the relationship between exercise capacity and other clinical measures and their relative contributions to exercise capacity in patients with COPD. Method: We studied 36 patients with stable COPD. All patients underwent baseline pulmonary function testing. Dyspnea during activities of daily living was assessed with the Oxygen Cost Diagram (OCD). The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and the St Georgeʹs Respiratory Questionnaire were used to assess psychologic status and health-related quality of life, respectively. All patients performed the 6-minute walking test, progressive cycle ergometry, and the cycle endurance test. Results: Each exercise capacity result correlated significantly with pulmonary function, the OCD, and the Activity and Total scores of the St Georgeʹs Respiratory Questionnaire. Multiple regression analyses revealed that the OCD was an important predictor of exercise capacity, especially for the walking test. Diffusing capacity was also a significant predictor on progressive cycle ergometry. Body mass index was the most significant predictor of the endurance time. Conclusion: The 3 different exercise tests had similar characteristics in relation to pulmonary function, dyspnea, and health-related quality of life in patients with COPD. However, some differences were found in the aspects they evaluated. (Heart Lung® 2002;31:374-81.)
Journal title :
Heart and Lung
Serial Year :
2002
Journal title :
Heart and Lung
Record number :
1858194
Link To Document :
بازگشت