Author/Authors :
Puntillo، نويسنده , , Kathleen A. and Smith، نويسنده , , Deborah and Arai، نويسنده , , Shoshana and Stotts، نويسنده , , Nancy، نويسنده ,
Abstract :
Background
ts in intensive care units (ICUs) can be adversely affected by distressing symptoms. When critically ill patients are unable to self-report symptoms, ICU nurses become proxy reporters.
ive
rpose of this prospective, descriptive study was to explore how ICU nurses assess and treat distressing symptoms in critically ill patients at high risk of dying.
s
-two nurses participated in this single-site, prospective, descriptive study and described their patientsʹ symptoms and how the symptoms were being managed in response to interviews that used open-ended questions. Taped interviews were transcribed verbatim, and themes were identified.
s
major themes were derived from the data: 1) signs of symptoms, (2) treatment of symptoms, and (3) “symptoms” versus “signs.” Most nurses did not make distinctions between the assessment of “signs” of disease and the assessment of “symptoms,” and consequently, signs and symptoms were frequently inventoried collectively.
sion
ally ill patients experience a broad range of symptoms. Continued attempts to validate nonverbal measures of symptoms are warranted because lack of such measures may adversely affect symptom treatment for critically ill patients. Furthermore, heightened awareness and increased education of nurses to differentiate between signs and symptoms lay the foundation for increasing attention on symptoms, improving accuracy of symptom assessment, and guiding appropriate symptom management.