Title of article :
Outcome after failed traumatic anterior shoulder instability repair with and without surgical revision
Author/Authors :
Marquardt، نويسنده , , Bjِrn and Garmann، نويسنده , , Stefan and Schulte، نويسنده , , Tobias and Witt، نويسنده , , Kai-Axel and Steinbeck، نويسنده , , Jِrn and Pِtzl، نويسنده , , Wolfgang، نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2007
Abstract :
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the incidence and reasons of recurrent instability in patients with traumatic anterior shoulder instability and to document the clinical results with regard to the number of stabilizing procedures. Twenty-four patients with failed primary open or arthroscopic anterior shoulder stabilization were followed for a mean of 68 (36-114) months. Following recurrence of shoulder instability, eight patients chose not to be operated on again, whereas 16 underwent repeat stabilization. A persistent or recurrent Bankart lesion was found in all 16 patients and concomitant capsular redundancy in 4. After the first revision surgery, further instability occurred in 8 patients, and 6 of them were stabilized a third time.Only 7 patients (29%) achieved a good or excellent result according to the Rowe score. All shoulder scores improved after revision stabilization. However, the number of stabilizing procedures adversely affected the outcome scores, as well as postoperative range of motion and patient satisfaction. Recurrent instability after a primary stabilization procedure represents a difficult diagnostic and surgical challenge, and careful attention should be paid to address persistent or recurrent Bankart lesions and concomitant capsular reduncancy. A satisfying functional outcome can be expected mainly in patients with one revision surgery. Further stabilization attempts are associated with poorer objective and subjective results.
Journal title :
Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery
Journal title :
Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery