• Title of article

    Radiographic comparison of pegged and keeled glenoid components using modern cementing techniques: A prospective randomized study

  • Author/Authors

    Edwards، نويسنده , , T. Bradley and Labriola، نويسنده , , Joanne E. and Stanley، نويسنده , , Rodney J. and OʹConnor، نويسنده , , Daniel P. and Elkousy، نويسنده , , Hussein A. and Gartsman، نويسنده , , Gary M.، نويسنده ,

  • Issue Information
    روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2010
  • Pages
    7
  • From page
    251
  • To page
    257
  • Abstract
    Background cementing techniques have improved glenoid fixation, reduced glenoid lucency seen with keeled components, and may eliminate differences attributable to glenoid design. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of glenoid design on immediate and follow-up radiographic lucency of pegged and keeled glenoid components, using modern cementing techniques. al and methods three total shoulder arthroplasties were performed in patients with primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis. Patients were randomized prospectively to receive either a pegged or keeled glenoid component. Three raters graded radiographic glenoid lucencies. s ediate radiographs, there was no significant difference in the rate of glenoid lucency between pegged (0%) and keeled (15%) glenoid components (P = .128). However, after an average of 26 months, the rate of glenoid lucency was significantly higher in patients with keeled components (46%) compared to patients with pegged components (15%) (P = .003). sion ith modern cementing techniques, pegged glenoid components remain radiographically superior to keeled glenoid components.
  • Keywords
    reconstruction , Osteoarthritis , Cement , component loosening , Arthroplasty , adult , Shoulder
  • Journal title
    Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery
  • Serial Year
    2010
  • Journal title
    Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery
  • Record number

    1868439