Title of article :
External review forpromotion and tenure in schools of nursing
Author/Authors :
Reilly، نويسنده , , Lyn and Carlisle، نويسنده , , Joan and Mikan، نويسنده , , Kathleen and Goldsmith، نويسنده , , Melissa، نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 1996
Abstract :
To obtain information about externalreview for tenure and/or promotion, the faculty affairs committee in a large nursing program located in the southeastern United States conducted a survey among programs that award a doctoral degree in nursing. Research questions focused on general tenure and promotion policies, policies and procedures regarding the use of external review, and perceived advantages and disadvantages of external review. A 22-item survey was sent to 53 institutions with a total of 34 usable surveys being returned. Findings revealed that a majority of the schools used external review, especially for tenure decisions and promotion to the associate and professor rank. Promotion and tenure criteria from individual schools were usually sent to reviewers along with the candidatesʹ curriculum vitae and manuscripts.
ates usually participated in the selection of external reviewers, but contact with reviewers was usually instituted by the administration within the institution. It was also felt that the advantage of external review far outweighed any disadvantages.
Journal title :
Nurse Education Today
Journal title :
Nurse Education Today