• Title of article

    Academic freedom, analysis, and the Code of Professional Conduct

  • Author/Authors

    Snelling، نويسنده , , Paul C. and Lipscomb، نويسنده , , Martin، نويسنده ,

  • Issue Information
    روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2004
  • Pages
    7
  • From page
    615
  • To page
    621
  • Abstract
    Summary e nursing’s move into higher education, academic freedom has received little attention within the literature. After discussing the concept of academic freedom, this paper argues that there is a potential tension between academic freedom and the requirement to educate student nurses who are fit for practice. One way in which this tension might be revealed is in the marking of student assignments. We ask the question – how should nurse educators mark an essay which is sufficiently analytical but reaches moral conclusions that lie outside the Code of Professional Conduct? We argue that despite an understandable temptation to penalise such an essay, invoking the Code of Professional Conduct to do so, no penalty should be applied, and academic freedom for students within higher education should be encouraged. This is because first, academic freedom is a good in itself especially as it allows unconventional and unpalatable conclusions to be discussed and rebutted, and second, applying a penalty on these grounds is necessarily inconsistent.
  • Keywords
    Academic Freedom , analysis , Code of Professional Conduct
  • Journal title
    Nurse Education Today
  • Serial Year
    2004
  • Journal title
    Nurse Education Today
  • Record number

    1874063