• Title of article

    A review of curriculum evaluation in United Kingdom nursing education

  • Author/Authors

    Roxburgh، نويسنده , , Michelle and Watson، نويسنده , , Roger and Holland، نويسنده , , Karen and Johnson، نويسنده , , Martin and Lauder، نويسنده , , William and Topping، نويسنده , , Keith، نويسنده ,

  • Issue Information
    روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2008
  • Pages
    9
  • From page
    881
  • To page
    889
  • Abstract
    Summary ly we have witnessed several significant changes to the nursing curriculum in the United Kingdom (UK). This review forms part of a larger study evaluating the ‘fitness for practice’ elements of the nursing curriculum in Scotland. Systematic review methods were used including the following databases: CINAHL and BNI. Twenty six papers were retrieved and 14 remained after applying the review criteria, the main rationale being the empirical focus. It appears that there is a paucity of research in this area in the UK and papers dealt exclusively with either content, process or outcome evaluation of the nursing curriculum. National, well funded, multi-centre studies tended to be more rigorous. Results, where they were positive about curricular changes, tended to be limited. There is clearly a need for rigorous research into curriculum evaluation, both at the micro and macro level, which investigates content, process and outcome. Without such research, curriculum change will be uninformed.
  • Keywords
    Evaluation , EDUCATION , Nurses , Nursing , Nurse education , Curriculum
  • Journal title
    Nurse Education Today
  • Serial Year
    2008
  • Journal title
    Nurse Education Today
  • Record number

    1875160