Title of article :
Recruitment, selection and retention of nursing and midwifery students in Scottish Universities
Author/Authors :
Rodgers، نويسنده , , Sheila and Stenhouse، نويسنده , , Rosie and McCreaddie، نويسنده , , May and Small، نويسنده , , Pauline، نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2013
Abstract :
SummaryBackground
ttrition rates from pre-registration nursing and midwifery programmes have been reported in both the UK and in other countries.
ives
y was conducted to identify best practice in recruitment, selection and retention across Scottish Universities providing pre-registration programmes.
ey of all universities providing pre-registration programmes in Scotland was conducted. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with key personnel in each university. Documentary evidence was collected to supplement interview data and evidence recruitment, selection and retention practices.
gs
iversities in Scotland providing pre-registration nursing and/or midwifery programmes.
ipants
identified universities agreed to take part and a total of 18 interviews were conducted.
s
tructured face to face and telephone interviews were conducted. Relevant documentary evidence was collected. All data were subject to thematic analysis.
gs
sities are predominantly concerned with recruiting to the institution and not to the professions.
iews are widely used, and are a requirement in the United Kingdom. However, there is no evidence base within the literature that they have predictive validity despite creating scales and scoring systems which are largely unvalidated.
udy identified initiatives aimed at addressing attrition/retention, however most had not been evaluated often due to the multi-factorial nature of attrition/retention and difficulties with measurement.
sions
tment selection and retention initiatives were rarely evaluated, and if so, adopted a relatively superficial approach. Evidence from existing studies to support practices was mostly weakly supportive or absent. The study highlights the need for a coordinated approach, supporting the development of a robust evidence base through the evaluation of local initiatives, and evaluation of new strategies. Evaluation strategies must take account of the local context to facilitate transferability of findings across different settings.
Keywords :
Recruitment , midwifery , Selection , best practice , Pre-registration education , Attrition , Retention , Nursing
Journal title :
Nurse Education Today
Journal title :
Nurse Education Today