Title of article
Health outcomes in older men with localized prostate cancer: Results from the Prostate Cancer Outcomes Study: Hoffman RM, Barry MJ, Stanford JL, Hamilton AS, Hunt WC, Collins MM, Medicine Service, New Mexico VA Health Care System, Albuquerque, NM
Author/Authors
Penson، نويسنده , , David F.، نويسنده ,
Issue Information
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2006
Pages
1
From page
457
To page
457
Abstract
Purpose
pared health-related quality-of-life (HRQOL) outcomes and survival of men with localized prostate cancer who received aggressive treatment with those receiving conservative management.
s
ducted a population-based cohort study of men aged 75 to 84 years when diagnosed with a clinically localized cancer in 1994 or 1995. We used medical record abstractions and patient surveys to obtain clinical and HRQOL data at diagnosis and 24-month follow-up. We used a propensity score method to adjust for baseline differences between men treated with radical prostatectomy or radiation therapy (n = 175) and men who received hormone therapy or no treatment (n = 290). Propensity scores were used in regression analyses comparing HRQOL outcomes between treatment groups. Overall and disease-specific survivals were estimated with multivariate proportional hazards models.
s
months following diagnosis, aggressively treated men were more likely to report daily urinary leakage (odds ratio [OR] = 2.9, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.2–7.0) and to be bothered by urinary problems (OR = 5.1, 95% CI, 1.3–9.1) and sexual problems (OR = 2.8, 95% CI, 1.2–6.3). The adjusted disease-specific mortality hazard ratio was 0.43 (95% CI, 0.15, 1.28), favoring aggressive treatment. However, the absolute 5-year disease-specific survival difference was only 6% (98% vs 92%). Over 80% of all deaths were from other causes.
sions
sive treatment was associated with significant decreases in disease-specific HRQOL. However, men who were aggressively treated for localized cancer had a minimally reduced absolute risk of dying from prostate cancer. Physicians and older patients should consider these outcomes in making decisions about screening and treatment.
Journal title
Urologic Oncology
Serial Year
2006
Journal title
Urologic Oncology
Record number
1888032
Link To Document